![]() ![]() ![]() Hans Urs von Balthasar, Andrew Louth, John Saward, Martin. 3: Studies in Theological Style: Lay Styles. In this, the whole level of image is once again transcended, because from an earthly point of view the boundlessness of the imaging love in Cross and Hell is absolutely withheld from sight-and in being absolutely withheld from sight, it makes the incomprehensibility of the divine love of the Father ‘visible’. The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics. But any idea of a concealment of God behind an iconostasis of hypostases is abandoned, because the Son offers no technical copy or physical emanation or static icon of the Father-it is in the boundless obedience of the Son that the boundless self-giving love of the Father ‘appears’. ![]() “In this process, the idea that the ‘image’ makes visible the invisible fundamental being is retained-‘Philip, he who sees me, sees the Son’ ( Jn 14:9). “not disincarnated, but made spiritual in the Resurrection” ( ) ![]() “ The God of the Bible is neither a tremendum nor a fascinosum, but first of all an adorandum. “The right approach does not consist in asking what Jesus said and did, and what he did not say and do, or which ‘titles of sovereignty’ he applied to himself and which not it consists in asking what was the necessary presupposition of the act whereby his community formed his words, deeds and titles in the way it did.” ( ) “the momentum of a divine word that demands the repentance of the heart and faith.” ( Pages 274–275) Logos Research Subscription for Schools. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |